Post by account_disabled on Dec 9, 2023 3:44:10 GMT
In reality there are many errors in blogging, not just 5, but here I talk about five categories of errors, for simplicity's sake. By reading and following several blogs, I have learned about errors and oversights that undermine the credibility of the blogger and the quality of the blog. #1 – Accents and apostrophes The accents and apostrophes on the web are inserted at random, without any apparent logic, depending on the blogger's pseudo-knowledge, on the fashions of the moment - everyone writes like this, therefore it is written like this - and also on a lack of attention to the form which, especially in professional blogs, it must not be missing. I point out the most frequent and obvious cases that I find in Italian blogs.
These are errors that I find in blogs by writers (?), by web professionals (web marketing and social media experts, copywriters) and which have often distanced me from those blogs. It's: it doesn't exist. The third person singular of the present indicative of the verb to be is written “ È ” in capital letters. I use OpenOffice Writer and if I write “è” after the Phone Number Data period it automatically transforms into “È”. Otherwise just type Alt+0200. Well : it doesn't exist. Not even the river is called Pò, but only Po. But the abbreviation of little requires an apostrophe, because the last syllable “co” drops and only little remains. Yes : it does not exist as an affirmative adverb. It is written "yes". Un : used without an apostrophe before a feminine word that begins with a vowel is an error, because “ un ” is only masculine.
In the feminine it is written "una" and the "a" falls before the vowel, therefore it requires an apostrophe. Yet the web is full of phrases like "an image", "an alternative", but you can also find "another". Yes : it doesn't exist. The first person singular of the present indicative of the verb to know is written “so”. Stà : written to indicate the third person singular of the present indicative or the second person singular of the present imperative of the verb stare . That word doesn't exist. In the first case you write "sta", in the second instead sta' with the apostrophe, because the "i" in "stai" falls out. Here : horrible to read. This word doesn't even exist. No one would ever think of pronouncing "qui" as "cui", with the accent on the "u".
These are errors that I find in blogs by writers (?), by web professionals (web marketing and social media experts, copywriters) and which have often distanced me from those blogs. It's: it doesn't exist. The third person singular of the present indicative of the verb to be is written “ È ” in capital letters. I use OpenOffice Writer and if I write “è” after the Phone Number Data period it automatically transforms into “È”. Otherwise just type Alt+0200. Well : it doesn't exist. Not even the river is called Pò, but only Po. But the abbreviation of little requires an apostrophe, because the last syllable “co” drops and only little remains. Yes : it does not exist as an affirmative adverb. It is written "yes". Un : used without an apostrophe before a feminine word that begins with a vowel is an error, because “ un ” is only masculine.
In the feminine it is written "una" and the "a" falls before the vowel, therefore it requires an apostrophe. Yet the web is full of phrases like "an image", "an alternative", but you can also find "another". Yes : it doesn't exist. The first person singular of the present indicative of the verb to know is written “so”. Stà : written to indicate the third person singular of the present indicative or the second person singular of the present imperative of the verb stare . That word doesn't exist. In the first case you write "sta", in the second instead sta' with the apostrophe, because the "i" in "stai" falls out. Here : horrible to read. This word doesn't even exist. No one would ever think of pronouncing "qui" as "cui", with the accent on the "u".